<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Building Support for Use-Based Design into Hardware Products</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dubberly.com/articles/use-based-design.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dubberly.com/articles/use-based-design.html</link>
	<description>Interaction, Software, and Service Design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 12:31:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr Jamie Brassett</title>
		<link>http://www.dubberly.com/articles/use-based-design.html/comment-page-1#comment-62749</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr Jamie Brassett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 13:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dubberly.com/?p=695#comment-62749</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This is interesting. And relates closely to what a colleague of mine, Pete Booth (Tin Horse Design, UK) &amp; myself call &quot;digestion&quot;. We have been arguing for some time against a &quot;consumption&quot; model of understanding our long term relationship with designed objects.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Our digestion project has had two publications so far:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;July 2008: &#039;Ecstatic Innovation. Digesting, Designing &amp; Democracy&#039;. With Peter Booth, in Re/Public, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.re-public.gr/en/?p=344&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.re-public.gr/en/?p=344&lt;/a&gt; Special Issue: &quot;Distributed Creativity &amp; Design&quot;, Ed. Artemis Yagou.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;July 2008: &#039;Design Digestion.  A Work in Progress&#039;. With Peter Booth, in Design Principles &amp; Practices: An International Journal. Vol.2 No.3. pp.75-82.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And two conference presentations.One of which where we described how these thoughts have led to us re-modelling the design process.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I hope you find these interesting too.
Jamie&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Course Director, MA Innovation Management
Central Saint Martins College of Art &amp; Design
University of the Arts London&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is interesting. And relates closely to what a colleague of mine, Pete Booth (Tin Horse Design, UK) &amp; myself call &#8220;digestion&#8221;. We have been arguing for some time against a &#8220;consumption&#8221; model of understanding our long term relationship with designed objects.</p>

<p>Our digestion project has had two publications so far:</p>

<p>July 2008: &#8216;Ecstatic Innovation. Digesting, Designing &amp; Democracy&#8217;. With Peter Booth, in Re/Public, <a href="http://www.re-public.gr/en/?p=344" rel="nofollow">http://www.re-public.gr/en/?p=344</a> Special Issue: &#8220;Distributed Creativity &amp; Design&#8221;, Ed. Artemis Yagou.</p>

<p>July 2008: &#8216;Design Digestion.  A Work in Progress&#8217;. With Peter Booth, in Design Principles &amp; Practices: An International Journal. Vol.2 No.3. pp.75-82.</p>

<p>And two conference presentations.One of which where we described how these thoughts have led to us re-modelling the design process.</p>

<p>I hope you find these interesting too.
Jamie</p>

<p>Course Director, MA Innovation Management
Central Saint Martins College of Art &amp; Design
University of the Arts London</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

