<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Analysis-Synthesis Bridge Model</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dubberly.com/articles/interactions-the-analysis-synthesis-bridge-model.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dubberly.com/articles/interactions-the-analysis-synthesis-bridge-model.html</link>
	<description>Interaction, Software, and Service Design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 11:19:24 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Putting people first &#187; Dubberly Design articles</title>
		<link>http://www.dubberly.com/articles/interactions-the-analysis-synthesis-bridge-model.html/comment-page-1#comment-5531</link>
		<dc:creator>Putting people first &#187; Dubberly Design articles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dubberly.com/?p=141#comment-5531</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] The analysis-synthesis bridge model Written for Interactions magazine by Hugh Dubberly, Shelley Evenson, and Rick Robinson - 1 March 2008 The simplest way to describe the design process is to divide it into two phases: analysis and synthesis. Or preparation and inspiration. But those descriptions miss a crucial element—the connection between the two, the active move from one state to another, the transition or transformation that is at the heart of designing. How do designers move from analysis to synthesis? From problem to solution? From current situation to preferred future? From research to concept? From constituent needs to proposed response? From context to form? [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The analysis-synthesis bridge model Written for Interactions magazine by Hugh Dubberly, Shelley Evenson, and Rick Robinson &#8211; 1 March 2008 The simplest way to describe the design process is to divide it into two phases: analysis and synthesis. Or preparation and inspiration. But those descriptions miss a crucial element—the connection between the two, the active move from one state to another, the transition or transformation that is at the heart of designing. How do designers move from analysis to synthesis? From problem to solution? From current situation to preferred future? From research to concept? From constituent needs to proposed response? From context to form? [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
