<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Designing for Service: Creating an Experience Advantage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dubberly.com/articles/designing_for_service.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dubberly.com/articles/designing_for_service.html</link>
	<description>Interaction, Software, and Service Design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 16:47:13 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Russo</title>
		<link>http://www.dubberly.com/articles/designing_for_service.html/comment-page-1#comment-26698</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Russo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dubberly.com/?p=1288#comment-26698</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This is the kind of work that will change the Internet.  So many of the nascent websites were terrible to use, and so many still are.  Providing a service through software is a tricky thing to do...it isn&#039;t about flash or easy ordering.  It seems like you&#039;re taking a holistic approach to determining what the optimum user experience should be....something determined by the user and the designer.  I think if more companies realized their websites are NOT based on providing a service, they would spend the money to have some design engineering done to get users to enjoy the experience and perhaps spend more.  And, this seems to be a process that needs to be repeated every so many years, because the experience would need to change as users change.  I suppose this is part of Web 2.0 or even 3.0.  There&#039;s a new reality for all companies; they have to use the web properly as a service medium or perish.  It&#039;s that simple; there are too many choices today for it to be otherwise.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the kind of work that will change the Internet.  So many of the nascent websites were terrible to use, and so many still are.  Providing a service through software is a tricky thing to do&#8230;it isn&#8217;t about flash or easy ordering.  It seems like you&#8217;re taking a holistic approach to determining what the optimum user experience should be&#8230;.something determined by the user and the designer.  I think if more companies realized their websites are NOT based on providing a service, they would spend the money to have some design engineering done to get users to enjoy the experience and perhaps spend more.  And, this seems to be a process that needs to be repeated every so many years, because the experience would need to change as users change.  I suppose this is part of Web 2.0 or even 3.0.  There&#8217;s a new reality for all companies; they have to use the web properly as a service medium or perish.  It&#8217;s that simple; there are too many choices today for it to be otherwise.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
