Comments on: An Evolving Map of Design Practice and Design Research http://www.dubberly.com/articles/an-evolving-map-of-design-practice-and-design-research.html Interaction, Software, and Service Design Tue, 02 Mar 2010 08:23:48 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Stinky43 http://www.dubberly.com/articles/an-evolving-map-of-design-practice-and-design-research.html/comment-page-1#comment-15692 Stinky43 Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:05:40 +0000 http://www.dubberly.com/?p=248#comment-15692 <p>Two of my co-workers were permanent in lower, but unrelated titles. ,</p> Two of my co-workers were permanent in lower, but unrelated titles. ,

]]> By: Thorlak Fink http://www.dubberly.com/articles/an-evolving-map-of-design-practice-and-design-research.html/comment-page-1#comment-15570 Thorlak Fink Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:11:15 +0000 http://www.dubberly.com/?p=248#comment-15570 <p>I would like to complement you on the evolving map. A splendid idea and a great artefact for communicating the interrelation between the different fields.</p> <p>I'm currently doing an exploratory study on service design and how it overlap other areas area e.g. HCI, marketing, behavioural science or business management and how their methods influence service design.</p> <p>Can I possibly get your perspective on where you would place service design on the "Evolving Map of Design Practice and Design Research"?</p> <p>Respectfully yours, Thorlak</p> I would like to complement you on the evolving map. A splendid idea and a great artefact for communicating the interrelation between the different fields.

I’m currently doing an exploratory study on service design and how it overlap other areas area e.g. HCI, marketing, behavioural science or business management and how their methods influence service design.

Can I possibly get your perspective on where you would place service design on the “Evolving Map of Design Practice and Design Research”?

Respectfully yours, Thorlak

]]> By: Angelina Russo http://www.dubberly.com/articles/an-evolving-map-of-design-practice-and-design-research.html/comment-page-1#comment-14267 Angelina Russo Mon, 21 Sep 2009 22:33:00 +0000 http://www.dubberly.com/?p=248#comment-14267 <p>Thanks for this indepth analysis! It is actually tremendously helpful given the range of approaches we are currently faced with. I recently came across a book entitled 'Design Driven Innovation. It is an interesting read. It uses case studies from italian manufacturers such as Alessi and Artemide - well known innovators. It provides a practical and substantial discussion on how and where design driven innovation can provide long-lived innovative products and services. It's focus on the 'change in meaning' of products and services is interesting and somewhat Italian-centric' (if that is a legitimate phrase) which is fair enough. The manufacturers he refers to are extremely successful! Regardless, I find that the focus on co-creativity is somewhat lost in the emphasis on avoiding user-centred design. It sounds like a paradox and this is why I will be spending some time trying to reinterpret it to develop a methodology which possibly more palatable to both sides of the arguement. In the meantime, the book can be found here http://www.amazon.com/Design-Driven-Innovation-Competition-Innovating/dp/1422124827/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1253572349&sr=8-1-spell</p> Thanks for this indepth analysis! It is actually tremendously helpful given the range of approaches we are currently faced with. I recently came across a book entitled ‘Design Driven Innovation. It is an interesting read. It uses case studies from italian manufacturers such as Alessi and Artemide – well known innovators. It provides a practical and substantial discussion on how and where design driven innovation can provide long-lived innovative products and services. It’s focus on the ‘change in meaning’ of products and services is interesting and somewhat Italian-centric’ (if that is a legitimate phrase) which is fair enough. The manufacturers he refers to are extremely successful! Regardless, I find that the focus on co-creativity is somewhat lost in the emphasis on avoiding user-centred design. It sounds like a paradox and this is why I will be spending some time trying to reinterpret it to develop a methodology which possibly more palatable to both sides of the arguement. In the meantime, the book can be found here http://www.amazon.com/Design-Driven-Innovation-Competition-Innovating/dp/1422124827/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1253572349&sr=8-1-spell

]]> By: BrianSJ http://www.dubberly.com/articles/an-evolving-map-of-design-practice-and-design-research.html/comment-page-1#comment-13987 BrianSJ Wed, 16 Sep 2009 18:05:40 +0000 http://www.dubberly.com/?p=248#comment-13987 <p>Nope. This does not accord with my understanding of current practice. User-centred design covers both the expert-led approach and the participatory approach. I recognise the community you are talking about in the user-centred design bubble, but you have definitely picked the wrong label.</p> Nope. This does not accord with my understanding of current practice. User-centred design covers both the expert-led approach and the participatory approach. I recognise the community you are talking about in the user-centred design bubble, but you have definitely picked the wrong label.

]]>